Illegal penises
A senior judge has been cleared of charges of exposure after allegedly flashing a woman on a train. The maximum penalty for exposure is a two-year jail sentence. In terms of rational and proportionate responses to perceived crimes, I think, in this case, convulsive mirth on the part of the general public would be about right. The law is an arse. Over and out.
6 comments:
Following on from this, while the Judge in question was not charged for exposing himself, it remains a crime to show your Johnson in public. However, new laws are having to be passed which give women the legal right to breast feed in public. While I am always in favour of people getting there bouncers out for a useful purpose, picture the scene: I am in a restaurant having lunch when a lady comes in with baby. She proceeds to give suck. Suddenly my milkshake becomes less tasty, and so my breast of pidgeon. While baby may be in desperate need of food, there is no need for him to eat at a restaurant. He can get a drive thru in private whenever he likes.
Babies are selfish and as such should have sanctions put on them until they can learn to behave properly.
This blogger asks why women should be allowed to expose themselves in public, and not honest male judges. Political correctness gone mad?
If only we were in the garden of eden, we'd all have leaves to cover up the naughty bits.
I thought covering up our nudity was how we came to be busted eating from the Tree of Knowledge and subsequently thrown out.
what is this nonsense? why has my serious criticism of our bombastic legal system been turned into an ill-conceived theological discussion?
...I love the idea of sanctioning babies.
The Garden of Eden story is best employed, for our purposes, to illustrate that there weren't any babies there...and it was paradise.
Therefore babies are evil.
Post a Comment